Why One-Size-Fits-All Doesn't Work in Real Estate Deals

In the world of real estate, every deal stands on its own unique grounds. Attempting to use a single template or calculation for every transaction is like trying to fit a round peg in a square hole. Whether it’s a Sub-to (subject-to) deal or a seller-financed deal, the nuances of each transaction require tailored approaches.

For instance, when engaging in these varied deal types, you might provide a distinct amount as a down payment, often referred to as 'X amount down.' However, expecting to apply this same amount across all properties is unrealistic. Similarly, enforcing a uniform percentage—say 10%—across different properties does not align with the logical complexity and diversity inherent in real estate dealings.

This diverse nature implies that real estate transactions simply cannot adhere to a one-size-fits-all payment structure. Each opportunity must be individually assessed on its own unique terms and conditions, ensuring that every decision made is well-informed and tailored to the specifics of the deal at hand.

At BILT, we understand the intricate nature of these dealings and emphasize the importance of evaluating each real estate transaction as a unique entity, allowing for creativity and flexibility in structuring deals.